Freddie and Fannie won’t pay down your mortgage


The two largest owners of mortgages will not lower the principal on the loans they back thats a clear message for all those troubled homeowners. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which are controlled by the federal government, will not lower the principal on the loans they back, instead opting for interest rate reductions and term extensions when modifying loans. But their stance is out of synch with the Obama administration, which is seeking to expand the use of principal writedowns. In late March, it announced servicers will be required to consider lowering balances in loan modifications. Asked whether they will implement balance reductions, the companies and their regulator declined to comment.

The Treasury Department also declined to comment. What’s holding them back is the companies’ mandate to conserve their assets and limit their need for taxpayer-funded cash infusions, experts said. If Fannie and Freddie lower homeowners’ loan balances, they are locking in losses because they have to write down the value of those mortgages. Essentially, that means using tax dollars to pay people’s mortgages. Between them, they have received $127 billion — and recently requested another $19 billion — from the Treasury Department since they were placed into conservatorship in September 2008, at the height of the financial crisis. Treasury and the companies have already set aside $75 billion for foreclosure prevention, which can be spent on interest-rate reductions or principal write downs. Meanwhile, a growing number of loans backed by Fannie and Freddie are falling into default.

PLUS: Look what Diana Olick said:

Diana Olick Banks Ignore Delinquent Borrowers

Some encouraging signs on the foreclosure front may not be as rosy as some are reporting. RealtyTrac, the online foreclosure sale site, shows a 9 percent dip in the number of properties with foreclosure filings in April, month-to-month. The driver of that dip is a big drop in new notices of default. The final stage of foreclosure is bank repossessions (REO) shot up to a new record high, up 45 percent from a year ago. When I first read the report I thought, okay, we knew there was a big pipeline of loans that would not get modified and would have to come out the end at some point; now is that point. The fact that fewer loans are going into the pipeline should be our focus, and that’s a positive. That’s what I thought until I interviewed RealtyTrac’s Rick Sharga. “People are sitting in their houses not paying their mortgages, and the banks are letting those delinquencies extend longer and longer periods of time before they put them in foreclosure,” Sharga told me. That, he adds, is the main reason we’re seeing lower numbers of new defaults. The borrowers are in default, but the banks aren’t paying attention, so they don’t show up in the numbers.

“The fact that we have six to six and a half million loans that are either seriously delinquent or in foreclosure also suggests we are not nearly out of the woods. If we just started to absorb that inventory at the pace we’re currently seeing new foreclosure proceedings we have about a 50 to 55 month supply of loans that yet have yet to be processed, so we have a way to go before we are out of the mess,” he added. Sharga makes a compelling point. A lot of folks are either falling out of the trial modification period or not qualifying in the first place, and those loans are moving quickly to bank repossession. California-based mortgage analyst Mark Hanson adds perspective with a look at “cancelled foreclosures.” These are not tracked by RealtyTrac, but they “bite right out of Notices of Default and foreclosures, so to get a real idea of how ‘credit’ is doing, you have to add a certain percentage back.” That’s because Hanson believes the redefault rate on these modifications will be at the very least 50 percent 6-19 months out.

What are your thoughts about this?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Twitter

Mortgage Principal Writedown Endorsed By Government


Diana Olick’s latest column puts “principal writedown” in perspective: “The government is officially giving borrowers back home equity.

Yep, somewhere between $35 and $50 billion worth. Of course we’ve all lost over $5 trillion, but who’s counting? Lenders still aren’t required to do it, but they’re going to get an awful lot of taxpayer-funded incentives to do itLet’s face it, the underwater issue (that is borrowers owing more on their loans than their homes are worth) is now far bigger than the subprime issue and the unemployment issue. Yes, it’s concentrated heavily in five states, but it still manages to plague home prices nationwide. People are walking away in greater numbers than ever before, and people who want to stay are unable to get into modification programs because of their overwhelming negative equity. Yesterday, before the House Oversight Committee, Treasury Secretary Herb Allison said his concern with principal write down was

1) expense,

2) fairness, and

3) moral hazard.

I asked him this morning what had changed overnight? ‘The moral hazard aspects are mitigated by the structure of the programs.’ I’m not entirely sure what that means, although I’m sure many smart people behind closed White House doors came up with that exact phrase. I guess it means that because borrowers and servicers have to earn the write down incentives over three years that it’s fair. Or maybe because it helps keeps borrowers out of foreclosure, thereby stabilizing home prices around them, that it’s fair. Or maybe because the servicers and investors have to bear some cost, that it’s fair. Maybe it’s just that there is simply no other way to get ourselves out from under this mess than to forget all the bad choices some lenders and borrowers made and give them a fresh start. And for those of us who acted responsibly? No pain no gain. As I tell my kids every day, life isn’t fair.”

What do you think? Will this help the economy or only a few people who are under water? What does this do for us as investors?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Twitter

Fractionalizing a Foreclosure – Part 1 of 2


Great news.
I finished the first video on fractionalizing a foreclosure, short sale or subject-to. I have to warn you in advance that the video is a little long (12 minutes), but I cover some pretty cool stuff.

Its amazing that you can now get control of a high end vacation home that you could not normally buy and never risk your credit or put up any money into the deal.

I will cover the remaining parts in a future video. So stay tuned.
Please let me know what you think or if you are interested in doing one of these yourself. Just click the comment button.
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Twitter

Mike Warren Interviews Jaff Kaller & Mr. X on Commercial Short Sales


Mike Warren Interviews Jeff Kaller & Mr. X on Commercial Short Sales

On our weekly training we are going to be teaching about commercial property short sales and how anyone can get in on the ground floor opportunity. We all know commercial property lags behind the residential market about 18 months. Well guess what? Here come the commercial property foreclosures. I made a short video about the call. Check it out.

Get on the call: http://misuniversity.com/webinar

To multiple income streams.

Mike Warren

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Twitter

Next Page »

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Powered by WishList Member - Membership Software